Page 2

February 2001

Back to home pagePage 1
Look Who's Got Their APR! (Page 3)


President's Column
By Monique Uher, APR
2001 President

You know, as I reflect upon the situation at Furr’s Supermarkets last week, I am reminded of a deep, dark secret I’ve carried close to my heart for more than a decade. True confession: I consciously never intended to practice public relations for a living. It’s tough work. You serve two masters – your organization and the public(s) it serves. You can get burned. 

Whether Suzanne Skaggs was misdirected or she acted of her own accord is of little merit to this dissertation. Directly or not, the profession of public relations has taken a hit to its credibility – at least locally. Although Ms. Skaggs is not a member of our chapter, and not, to the best of my knowledge, a member of PRSA national, as stewards of the reputation of our profession, the question is, should we react? Maybe should we reach out to her. Maybe, to paraphrase Voltaire, we should all tend our own gardens. 

As little as six months ago, PRSA’s Code of Ethics outlined a course of action specifically aimed at protecting the professionalism of public relations. Now, with a new code of ethics in place, one aimed at reinforcement as opposed to enforcement, the course of action is not so clear. The new code emphasizes education and training, with a focus on universal values that “inspire ethical behavior” by providing language, experience and examples to help the individual practitioner “better achieve important ethical and principled business objectives.” Assistance with interpretation of the code is long overdue, but does it go far enough in protecting the integrity of the industry? 

It wasn’t so long ago public relations practitioners were held in questionable esteem. And I’m not talking about the PT Barnum era. The concept of “spin” and the term “spin doctors” found their way into mainstream vernacular with the advent of the Clinton-Gore era. Suddenly PR practitioners were synonymous with the folks whose job it (still is) to turn every word, pause, phrase and blink of the eye into a “win” for his or her side of the political arena. Think about it: how many of you found yourselves talking to clients who wanted you to “spin” a message to better suit their cause? 

One of the greatest benefits of membership in PRSA is association with a body of professionals recognized for their solid, upstanding work in a profession with great potential for vilification. But what good does association with a group of really great, totally respected people do if the profession they practice becomes the butt of liar jokes?  

Don’t get me wrong. I love what I do and I absolutely don’t regret my choice of profession (though I consciously desired never to work in this field, I later consciously changed my mind and pursued a PR career). It’s tough sometimes but it’s rewarding almost all of the time. I get to bridge communication gaps and reverse misperceptions in service to both my masters. I know there’s risk involved; I welcome it, as I know many of you do. I just want to be sure that, if I do stumble, the butt of the joke is me. Not the tens of thousands of diligent professionals around the world working toward the proliferation of sound public relations. 

I invite you to check out the new code of ethics and use the chapter listserv to begin a dialogue on this and other issues pertaining to the practice of public relations and professional communications. 

Until next month,
Monique (now APR) Uher